| 01:13 | <Chutt> | i don't like how oz treats the internal flash as r/w storage Apr 25 01:13:32 <yebyen> hm Apr 25 01:14:48 |
| 05:49 | <-- | Viddy has quit (Remote closed the connection) Apr 25 07:01:37 <-- Ndiin has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection |
| 07:15 | <-- | PBlue_away has quit (niven.freenode.net irc.freenode.net) Apr 25 07:15:58 <-- mdz__ has quit (niven.freenode.net |
| 15:00 | <Chutt> | once thor gets back =) Apr 25 15:00:33 <rkulagow_> hrmm. ok. i'll keep it in mind then. Apr 25 15:08:07 |
| 18:53 | <TheAsp> | Morph: according to my research they suck ass :P Apr 25 18:53:48 <TheAsp> inman: attempting... Apr 25 |
| 18:54 | <inman> | i just built a 128bit wep wifi next last month (using netgear). it works great. Apr 25 18:54:30 <TheAsp> and |
| 20:06 | <inman> | did you use someone else's technique, or is this of your own design? Apr 25 20:06:46 <Chutt> this is mine Apr |
| 20:17 | <inman> | Ripp: there seems to be some docs in gentoo's /etc/inittab. read 'em. Apr 25 20:17:30 <Morph> Chutt: to quote |
| 20:51 | <TheAsp> | does it work with xawtv? Apr 25 20:52:06 <mbrian> haven't tried.. Apr 25 20:52:17 <mbrian> thats a good |
| 21:06 | <inman> | hit o, i think, and then set it up for us-cable and ntsc. Apr 25 21:06:42 <TheAsp> you dont need a display |
| 21:13 | <mbrian> | bttv0: using: BT848( *** UNKNOWN/GENERIC **) [card=0,autodetected] Apr 25 21:13:28 <mbrian> bttv0: using |
| 21:13 | <TheAsp> | not according to that :) Apr 25 21:14:00 <mbrian> works fine Apr 25 21:14:08 <TheAsp> bttv0: i2c attach |
| 22:07 | <inman> | theasp you could get around it with 5 this-day, this-time schedules. Apr 25 22:07:12 <TheAsp> but i cant set |
| 22:40 | <Chutt> | why would it do that? Apr 25 22:40:59 <inman> so as not to apply to future recordings? Apr 25 22:41:10 <Chutt> |
| 22:44 | <Chutt> | would be to schedule an anytime recording for anything matching the search term in the future Apr 25 22:44:42 |
| 22:45 | <inman> | Chutt: i want to compare it to my tivo and try to get the best of both worlds, but basically, yeah. Apr 25 |
| 22:48 | <Chutt> | which is the important thing :p Apr 25 22:48:16 <inman> aha, the zen of myth-ui. Apr 25 22:48:27 <Chutt> |
| 22:53 | * | inman is repeating the tivo UI for chutt's benefit. ;-) Apr 25 22:53:31 <Chutt> you'd want to be able to assign a |
| 22:54 | <inman> | conflicts are a fact of life. Apr 25 22:54:36 <inman> here's the way tivo works: Apr 25 22:54:50 <inman> when |
| 22:56 | <inman> | so, if you want to be sure that Simpsons come before Beavis & Butthead, you just list Simpsons above Beavis. |
| 22:56 | <Chutt> | so in this big list Apr 25 22:57:01 <Chutt> you have every single program you've selected prioritized Apr 25 |
| 22:58 | <Chutt> | i'm trying to convince you that assigning a distinct priority to every single program is utterly broken. Apr |
| 23:13 | <inman> | Chutt: it seems to me that if no_delete is true, that section should not be run, since it involves deletion. |
| 23:14 | <Chutt> | no, you're not understanding the feature =) Apr 25 23:14:11 <inman> clearly. :-) Apr 25 23:14:21 <Chutt> it's |
| 23:52 | <PeteCool> | if you do that don't set the default runlevel to 5, though Apr 25 23:52:50 <PeteCool> inman: you use |